Wahoga Village Beginnings This blog will document the progress of the Wahoga Village Project in its physical, virtual, and spiritual progress. Hopefully, in the years to come this documentation will be read as a how-to manual for preserving a culture. Spencer Working the Indian Field Days:
Spencer The parables of Jesus can be divided into two general categories: His parables use farming, shepherding, being in debt, doing hard labor, banquets, being excluded from banquets, rich homes, and poor people. I had a professor in seminary who said that interpreting parables and he was mostly talking about the parables of Jesus is challenging at best.
He suggested that perhaps they should best be understood as a cross between a riddle and a zen koan, a cross between a joke, a puzzle, and a pool of wisdom.
The thing that makes the parables like riddles is the surprising twist at their endings.
He used things like miraculous harvests, enemies being friends, and unexpected vindication. The thing that makes the parables puzzles is how challenging it is to figure out the wisdom Jesus is trying to impart.
In our quest for the wisdom of the parables, we often interpret them as morality tales, as moral fables, and in the process, we obscure the real wisdom they have to offer.
This happens much too easily when we forget or simply ignore the socio-cultural context in which the parable was originally told. When this happens, we often end up recontextualizing the story in our own unconscious socio-cultural assumptions.
And within our unconscious socio-cultural assumptions, the Spencer s dispossessing the wilderness response ends up domesticated. And that does the parables of Jesus a disservice. They are much too wild to be domesticated.
In the best case, they were trying to help make the parable understandable and, contextualizing the story in their own unconscious socio-cultural assumptions, stuck those words in. They assumed that this was a parable about heaven or about the last judgment, so they added these words.
In the worst case, they purposefully tried to weaken the power of the parable given that they worked for a king. In either case, this addition wreaks havoc on an accurate understanding of the parable. When we do this, the Master in the story ends up representing God, and a pretty darn ugly picture of God at that.
This God is an absentee landlord who cares only about profit maximization. This God is hard-hearted and ruthless.
This God is nothing like the God I hear Jesus talking about elsewhere in the gospels. They would have heard and immediately recognized Jesus describing a great household, a huge household — the closest thing in his day to the corporation in our day. It was quite common for the patriarch of a great household to be away on business, be it economic or political business.
One talent was equal to 6, denarii.
This story is about a man with a lot of money! They knew all too well how the Imperial economy works, and who suffers as a result. The large landowners made loans to peasant small landowners based on speculation about future crop production.
With high interest rates and possibilities of poor weather conditions, farmers were often unable to make their payments and faced foreclosure. Once in control of the land, the new owner could continue raking in the money by hiring laborers to farm cash crops. It is an economy based on abundance and self-restraint, not scarcity and greed.
When we only gather up what we need and share the rest, there really is enough for everyone. When you look at the parable through the lens of Sabbath economics, the third slave is, in fact, the hero.
When the master returns to settle accounts, he says the same thing to the first two slaves: But rub that hearing out of your ears and hear it how I think it would have been heard by people around Jesus. They are still stuck in a system that uses the have-nots so the haves can have more.
Then we turn to the third slave. But before he has to face the music, he gets to be a whistle-blower. The master profits from the backbreaking labor of those who work the land.A Survey of the Historical Literature The American people have had a complex relationship with nature.
On the one hand, we have exploited the nation's natural resources with devastating speed -- clearing forests, damming rivers, killing wildlife, fouling the air and water with pollutants. · A Survey of the Historical Literature The American people have had a complex relationship with nature.
On the one hand, we have exploited the nation's natural resources with devastating speed -- clearing forests, damming rivers, killing wildlife, fouling the air and water with monstermanfilm.com://monstermanfilm.com View Barry Wallace’s profile on LinkedIn, the world's largest professional community.
Barry has 4 jobs listed on their profile. See the complete profile on LinkedIn and discover Barry’s connections and jobs at similar monstermanfilm.com://monstermanfilm.com View Spencer Paxson’s profile on LinkedIn, the world's largest professional community. Spencer has 6 jobs listed on their profile.
See the complete profile on LinkedIn and discover Spencer’s monstermanfilm.com Monroe County Sheriff's Department added 2 new photos. November 16 at AM · On 11/15/18 Deputies Thiery and Wasson responded to the Charles Deam Wilderness Nation Forest on S SR in reference to suicidal monstermanfilm.com://monstermanfilm.com George Eliot and Herbert Spencer On Spencer's response to Comte, "Feminist Criticism in the Wilderness." George Eliot.